2007 Game
7: USC vs. Notre Dame
-
Offense Notes
Date - October 20, 2007
Location - South Bend, Indiana
Result: USC 38 - Notre Dame0
This was a nice win for the USC Trojans on the road in a location that
it is traditionally very difficult to win at over the years. If indeed I
heard the announcers
on TV correctly this was only the 12th win
for USC in history at Notre Dame, the first time since 1933 since the
Trojans shut out the Fighting Irish at home, and the largest margin of
victory in the series ever for USC. The contest felt like the sort of
game that Trojans fans were
hoping for but perhaps not necessarily expecting after the three
previous struggles versus Washington, Stanford, and Arizona. USC did
some things very well
this game but enthusiasm has to be tempered with the reality that this
is just not that
good of a Notre Dame football team this season. Still all things
considered it
was a tremendous
road win for the program and a confidence boost for everyone I suspect.
Let's hope it is a harbinger of things to come for the rest of the
season. Here are some notes from the game and key stats I compiled
afterwards
on the teams performance. Below I'll review the different touchdown
plays and highlights. There was a lot to celebrate this game and I'll
cover a little more than usual as a result.
How USC Scored
Drive
Starting Point
|
Points
|
Comment
|
Long field scoring
drives
|
24
|
3 Long Field TD
Drives (79, 55, 67 Yards) 1 Long FG Drive (57 Yards)
|
Short field scoring
drives
|
14
|
2 Short Field
TD Drives
(10, 13 Yards)
|
Direct scores
by the defense or special teams
|
0
|
No direct
scores. Irish turnovers set up both short field drives.
|
Totals
|
38
|
3TD's
& 2 FG's in total.
|
USC was able to get back to its steady state of scoring 24 points per
game when starting on its own side of the field. This is the general
average for the program from 2002 to present just above every year
except 2005.
The delta in most high scoring games are the easy short field points
when USC starts inside
the opponent's side of the field. This game featured two such
opportunities after Irish turnovers and USC converted both for
touchdowns.
I won't update the YTD trend chart for long field points
this week. Instead I'll show another one that Pete Carroll likes to
mention - turnovers lost by USC and the effect on points scored. Here
is the YTD chart for how many
points USC has scored by game and right below it is how many
turnovers the team has
lost each game. The graphs are roughly an inverse this season as lower
turnover games normally result in higher point totals
and easier victories (yes of course there are exceptions). Add in the
opponent's turnovers on top of this (especially ones on their side of
the field) and you can see why the staff emphasizes this aspect of the
game so much. How well USC takes care of the ball and creates turnovers
and short field scoring opportunities going forward will have a big
impact on how the
squad does the rest of the season.

Here are some other key stats worth noting that I
compiled after the game for review.
Key Stats Check
Category
|
USC
|
Comment
|
Red Zone Efficiency
|
100%
|
USC
was 4 for 4 in the red zone and had two long strikes from outside the
red zone area as well.
|
First Down (+4)
Efficiency
|
77%
|
USC
generated a season high 77% +4 yards on first down. This creates many
favorable short yardage plays on 2nd and 3rd down.
|
Turnovers Lost/Gained
|
+2
|
Zero
interceptions in the game for USC and only the late Hershel Dennis
fumble occurred.
|
Big Plays (+10 on
runs)
|
6
|
6
Big Runs
of 10 yards (or greater) for 102 yards in total. Half of the big run
yards came on the
Joe McKnight run.
|
Big Plays (+15 on
pass)
|
3
|
The
Trojans completed three pass plays of greater than 15 yards
(48, 17, & 21 yards) for 86 yards in total. Just over half came on
the Vidal Hazelton highlight reception and run.
|
Overall Scoring
Drive
Conversion
|
40%
|
USC
scored on 6 of its 15
drives for 40%. This is roughly on average with the performance last
season. Last year often had 2-3 fewer drives per game however.
|
Average Drive Length
|
31.1
yards
|
The
overall average drive length was 31.1 yards with is right at the
historic average level.
|
Scoring Drive Length
|
46.8
yards
|
Scoring
drive length was just 46.8 yards this game which is one of the lowest
marks since the 2003
squad which averaged this
level for an entire season due to all the
turnovers and short field scoring opportunities generated that season.
|
3rd Down Conversion
|
35.7%
|
USC
was just 5 of 14 on third down conversions in the game which is lower
than the season average. YTD USC is at 45.2% overall.
|
4th Down Conversion
|
0%
|
USC
was 0 for 1 in fourth down conversions. YTD the squad is now at 60% on
4th down
conversions (6 of 10 so far).
|
Sacks Generated
|
5
Sacks
|
USC
finally had a break out game and generated a season high five sacks and
vaulted up to
38th in the country. This moved the season average up to 2.4 sacks per
game.
|
Tackles For Loss
|
10
TFL's
|
There
were 10 TFL's by the defense in total. This now puts USC at 63rd
in the nation with 43 in total or 6.14 per game.
|
USC Overall Offensive Stats
Plays
|
Number
|
Yards
|
Per
Play Average
|
Run Plays
|
36
|
227
|
6.3
|
Pass Plays
|
38
|
235
|
6.2
|
Total Plays
|
74
|
462
|
6.25
|
This game total yardage was right back at the season average for the
first five games of
the year. The Arizona game had dropped off considerably in points and
yardage but this game
rebounded nicely to get back on track. Here is the overall
trend on a total yards basis and yards per play basis for 2007
YTD.

Passing Game
The passing game worked better this week against the Irish than it did
last week versus Arizona. A big part of that simply has to be the
comfort level of Mark Sanchez after getting that first win under his
belt.
I really think he played well for his first road game and his future
sure looks bright. Overall the staff still kept the game plan fairly
conservative but
there was more success in attacking down the field this week than last
week. There were 4 TD passes in the game for Mark Sanchez and I'll
highlight them below.
First I think it is worth noting the batted down passes that occurred
in the game. A lot of fans and announcers seem to think this only
occurs when John
David Booty is in the game for USC. I have pictures of the same result
happening
with Matt Leinart, Carson Palmer, and now Mark Sanchez in addition to
John David Booty. A couple of weeks ago I saw QB Brian
Brohm of Louisville (6' 4" 228 pounds) have 4 batted down at the line
of scrimmage in a single
game this year. This phenomenon is a nice adjustment
that defenses
are making versus the
shorter throws that come on quick three step drop passing plays. I
credit the announcers
for
correctly pointing out however that batted down balls are good play on
the part of the
offensive line and not simply a QB issue. Mark had two passes in the
game that
were batted down near the line of scrimmage and another two that were
tipped
as he threw them away to avoid a sack. On defense USC batted down
several as well.

|

|

|
The first batted
down pass came on a 2nd and 10 play for USC on the first drive of the
game.
|
It was a quick 3
step drop with a plan of throwing the slant play to the left to the
WR isolated in one on one coverage.
|
Unfortunately the ND
defender read the play and timed his leap perfectly. The result was a
batted down pass.
|

|

|

|
The second batted
down pass came on a 3rd down and 4 play on the 6th drive of the game.
It was out of a 2TE set and Patrick Turner split tight left.
|
It was again an
attempt to throw a quick little slant in route to the WR.
|
The pass was batted
down at the line of scrimmage by the ND defender. If I heard correctly
the one ND player now has 9 of these on the season alone.
|
I'll have some pictures of the passes that USC batted down in the game
when I get to the defense notes.
Pass Yards, Completions, YPA & YPC
Here are the YTD passing yards per game as well as completion
percentage, YPA, and YPC figures. If the 2-3 dropped passes per game
would stop these figures would all be slightly better.

YPA & YPC Trend

The YPA and YPC numbers year to date are definitely low compared to
historic levels of the past five years although they
were improving through the Stanford game. Then the game plan had to be
reset to a more conservative level once the more experienced John David
Booty went
down. Regardless of who starts the next couple of games I expect things
will continue the upward trend in the passing department back to the
12+ yard area for YPC of previous years.
Mark Sanchez TD Pass Plays
There were four TD pass plays in the games that came with nice
execution by the Trojans. Below I'll highlight them with pictures.
Fred Davis TD Reception

|

|

|
Here was the first
TD pass after the botched punt return by Notre Dame. It starts off with
a 2TE formation and Fred Davis winged to one side in an H-back position.
|
The TE Davis
motioned across the formation to the boundary side of the field.
|
I can't show it in
pictures but Mark Sanchez made a nice pump fake to the WR #7 Hazelton
left to fake the screen pass.
|

|

|

|
I could not tell if
the pump fake had any effect or not. Initially it appears that TE Davis
is well covered.
|
However he surged
and created separation as the Notre Dame DB turned to look for the pass.
|
The result was a
nice catch by Davis over the head of the defender for the initial TD of
the game.
|
Allen Bradford TD Reception

|

|

|
The second TD pass
came on a nice counter to one of USC's run plays out of a single back
set with 2 WR's left and 2 TE's right with Fred Davis flexed in an
H-back position.
|
The line play and
motion of the WR motioning inward make this look like a run play
initially to the
defense.
|
However it is a
designed
naked roll out to the right and it looked like it caught the
Irish somewhat off guard at least.
|

|

|

|
Mark had a clear
lane to throw to the FB Bradford wide open on the ten yard line.
|
On a minor nit picky
note the pass looked like it was thrown behind and low and Bradford had to
turn around to make the catch. Otherwise well executed.
|
Still even with this
added degree of difficulty Bradford was able to beat the Irish defender
and
find the end zone.,
|
Stanley Havili TD Reception

|

|

|
Here is the 4th
score of the game for USC. It came on a third down and short play. The
Trojans are in the Straight I Formation with 2 TE's and Notre Dame has
to respect the run option first out of this formation.
|
The play is sold
nicely once again with a play fake to the tailback in order to freeze
the linebackers in
position for a moment.
|
The offensive line
did a nice job in protection for the quarterback and he had plenty of
time to let the play develop.
|

|

|

|
Stanley Havili ran a
nice little flare pattern to the flats and the Notre Dame defender
could not come over in time. This time the ball was thrown nicely to
the correct outside shoulder.
|
At the goal line
Stanley made a nice little hop over the defender to make the defender
miss.
|
The result was a
nice play and fairly easy TD for the fourth score of the game and a
24-0 lead after the extra point.
|
Vidal Hazelton TD Reception
Here was the highlight pass play of the game. Brad Walker gets credit
for his initial movement and confusion that it creates at the line of
scrimmage. This delayed the release of the Notre Dame defensive back
and left Vidal Hazelton wide open down field. He also then made several
nice moves to generate yards after catch and find the end zone.

|

|

|
The play came on a
third and 2 so the Irish were respecting the run with seven men in the
box instead of 6 this formation.
|
ND had just one
safety deep on the play and the outside WR's in man coverage it
appeared.
|
Vidal Hazelton got
free right after Brad Walker came underneath to influence the play
after the snap
|
 |
 |
 |
The result was a
nice open catch and no way the free safety could come over for help in
time on this play.
|
That alone would
have made it a nice gain but Vidal makes a nice cut inside to get by
the Irish DB.
|
Then inside around
the 10 yard line he executes a spin move to get free again. Kudos to
#53 Jeff Byers for making it all the way down field to block as well!
|
 |
 |
 |
Once again I thought
the Irish defender had Vidal Hazelton here but he shakes off his would
be tackler with some very physical play.
|
And finally twists
and turns
into the end zone for a nice 48 yard TD that was 28 yards of pass and
20 yards of amazing YAC. Even Matt Spanos #69 was down field
blocking as well. Nice effort by all!
|
I can't tell if the
Irish were supposed to switch or "banjo" their assignments or stay with
their man. Looks like they got crossed up. Nice play by Brad Walker
regardless to get Hazelton free.
|
Here is the histogram for USC's completed pass plays in the game.
Overall only 3
pass plays of greater than 15 yards were completed versus Notre Dame
for 86
yards. However there were several other passes in the 10-14 yard range
that were very nice as well. This area should keep improving as the
WR's
gain experience, improve their route running, and improve their overall
sense of timing with the quarterback.

The offensive line did a nice job overall this week protecting the QB
when factoring in all the injuries that have occurred this season.
Considering that a new starter like Butch Lewis was protecting the
blind side of the QB at left tackle I found it amazing that no sacks
were allowed in the game according to the stats. However that is also
partly
due to the added mobility of Mark Sanchez to escape from trouble on his
own at times. Nice job regardless by the entire offensive line. I also
like how Mark Sanchez will pull down the ball and run for yardage at
times unlike John David Booty. I just hope that Mark learns to tuck the
ball away better or it will result in a fumble at some point in time. I
suspect the starter next week at Oregon will revert back
to Booty if his fractured finger is healed up and he has a good week in
practice. If not Mark Sanchez
certainly
acquitted himself nicely and I think his future regardless is very
bright. I think the staff has to be pretty confident with either option
at this point. How fast could the media say "QB controversy" after the
final gun sounded?
Running Game
After a two game dip the USC rushing attack returned again to a very
healthy level. However Notre Dame is not a strong rush
defense team ranking just 95th in the nation. Given all the injuries
that have affected the offensive line so
far this
performance was still impressive and encouraging. A healthy line, the
return of Stafon
Johnson, and the maturation of Joe McKnight will make a big
contribution going forward. USC now is
averaging 202 yards per
game and 5.3 yards per rush for the season. These figures are higher
than any other final rushing stats of the Pete Carroll era except for
the 2005
squad of course.

On a yards per carry basis it looks like this trend chart above. As the
offensive line
regains its health I'm optimistic this level can continue against most
teams. The zone blocking execution in particular seems better than last
year and the
running backs ability to spot holes and cut back seems improved as
well. Major challenges running the ball will come soon against Oregon
State
and UCLA which are both ranked in the top 10 in rush defense in the
nation.For comparison Oregon the opponent next week ranks 50th in the
nation and allows 143 rush yards per game on average. The University of
Houston did run for
314 yards versus Oregon in the first game of the year and Washington
ran for 164 yards in the latest game. On the lower side Cal could only
muster 115 yards
on the
ground versus the Ducks but had more success through the air.
Here is a histogram of the USC overall rush attack versus Notre Dame
showing all
the
carries. There was consistent ability to generate yards in the three to
six yard category which is always beneficial. Six carries
of greater than 10 yards resulted in 102 of the total rushing yards.
The Joe McKnight run accounted for about half of the big run play
yardage. He also generated several of the negative yardage plays this
week and last week but that is somewhat the nature of elusive backs
versus power backs.

Joe McKnight 51
yard run 4th Quarter

|

|

|
Here USC lined up in
the straight I formation with WR's split to both sides. Quite often
plays like this go to the strong side of the formation and to the wide
side of the field.
|
This looks like
either USC's version of the stretch hand off play or a standard
fullback lead isolation play .
The run goes into the boundary side of the
field and to the weak side following the lead of FB Havili. It looks
like the ND corner was blitzing on the play expecting pass.
|
Notre Dame's CB
comes in and almost makes a tackle for loss on the play in the back
field. However he just misses and this is the ".1" second extra speed
that a player like Joe McKnight
brings to the offense.
|
 |

|

|
After escaping the
first ND player he finds a nice crease due to good blocks by Havili as
well as the WR who I believe was Patrick Turner on this play blocking
the free safety.
|
Once in the clear
there is almost no chance that someone will be able to bring McKnight
down
from behind unless they have the angle.
|
51 yards later Joe
McKnight has his second long run in consecutive weeks. Nice play all
around by the Trojans.
|
Special Teams Related -
Blocked Punt
There were fewer mistakes on offense for the Trojans this week but one
of them came on
a blocked punt. It looked like a nice play up the middle by the Irish.
The replay angle was not much help on the TV. Maybe the Monday
Morning QB folks will hear if there was a missed assignment up front or
if this was just a good special teams play by the Irish. Anyway it is
something more
to work on in practice this week. Fortunately it did not lead to
any points for the Irish as USC came right back and blocked their FG
attempt. I'll highlight that in the defense notes later in the week.
Offensive by Downs & Run versus Pass
Downs
|
Runs
|
Passes
|
Total
|
1st
|
23
|
13
|
36
|
2nd
|
10
|
13
|
23
|
3rd
|
3
|
11
|
14
|
4th
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
36
|
38
|
74
|
This week it looked like the coaches were more comfortable with Mark
Sanchez under center making his second start. However as you can see
from this breakdown the coaching staff still called a fairly
conservative game plan on the road with far more run plays than passes
on first down. That was also no doubt due to the fact that Notre Dame
is currently 95th in the country in rush defense and allowing 191.8
rush yards per game.
Down
|
1st
Runs
|
2nd
Runs
|
3rd
Runs
|
4th
Runs
|
1st
Passes
|
2nd
Passes
|
3rd
Passes
|
4th
Passes
|
Attempts
|
23
|
10
|
3
|
0
|
13
|
13
|
11
|
1
|
Yards
|
176
|
46
|
5
|
0
|
107
|
46
|
82
|
1
|
Average
|
7.7
|
4.6
|
1.7
|
0
|
8.2
|
3.5
|
7.5
|
0.0
|
Also as you can see from this further breakdown the Trojans has a lot
of
success on first down running and also passing plays. That is a key
point
for putting the team in manageable 2nd down or 3rd down and short
yardage plays. 283 yards came on first down plays for the Trojans
in the game out of 462 yards total.
By situation the offense maps out like this. There was a high tendency
to run on first down in this game and to pass on third down medium and
long plays.
This is fairly normal for most teams but usually USC is more balanced
on their first down plays.
USC Offense by Situation
Down
|
Situation
|
Run
|
Pass
|
1st
|
Long
|
23
|
13
|
|
Medium
|
0
|
0
|
|
Short
|
1
|
0
|
2nd
|
Long
|
4
|
4
|
|
Medium
|
3
|
8
|
|
Short
|
3
|
1
|
3rd
|
Long
|
0
|
5
|
|
Medium
|
0
|
4
|
|
Short
|
3
|
2
|
4th
|
Long
|
0
|
0
|
|
Medium
|
0
|
0
|
|
Short
|
0
|
1
|
Total
|
|
36
|
38
|
USC Offense by Formation
Formation
|
Total
|
Runs
|
Yards
|
Passes
|
Yards
|
I
Formation
|
32
|
23
|
172
|
9
|
59
|
3
WR Sets
|
30
|
10
|
57
|
20
|
153
|
2
TE
|
10
|
3
|
-2
|
7
|
23
|
4
WR
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
5
WR
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Missing*
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
*Note: Due to late TV return from commercial
break unable to ascertain.
I'll post this additional summary from time to time and then look at it
more in
the off season when time allows. This is a very, very general
categorization of the USC formations in a typical game. In
reality it is more difficult when considering motion, personnel, and
the
exact specifics of the alignment. Let's just take
the 2 back I Formation for example of which there were 32 plays in the
game. On these alignments there
are easily over a dozen variations when all is said and done.
Here are just half a dozen of the more common I Formation alignments.
|

|

|
Straight I Formation
with 2 WR's
Split but set tight closer to the formation.
|
Straight I Formation
3 WR's (1x2) with the twins set to the wide side of the field.
|
Straight I Formation
with 2 TE's and 1 WR
to the wide side of the field.
|

|

|

|
Offset I Formation
with FB
set strong (King set). One wide receiver tight and one split
wider.
|
Offset I Formation
with FB right with 2 TE's and single WR split wide right.
|
Offset I Formation
with 3 WR's (1x2). Fullback is set left to the twin wide receiver side.
|
These are just six of the more common slight variations of the I
Formation for
USC. In reality there are more at the detailed level each game since
the opponent
also has to account for such things as motion of the WR's, personnel
groupings, location on the hash mark (right, left, middle) and area of
the field (red zone, normal, or backed up, etc.). Each impacts the
specifics of the play call out of the formation. When all is said and
done USC has of course five or six run plays and a half dozen common
pass
plays out of a formation such as this one. The most common running
plays out of
the I Formation are generally the
inside zone to the right or left, the stretch or outside zone left or
right, the isolation lead play to a specific gap in the line, the
old USC favorite toss play outside left or right, the fullback dive up
the middle or the power off
tackle plays to the left
or right where either the left guard or right guard pulls and the
tailback follows the fullback and guard off tackle. The same goes for
passing plays out of the formation. For each run play there is an
opposite counter play that
looks like a run but turns into a pass. For each of the I Formation
alignments above there are 3 step drop related WR pattern plays, 5 step
drop related WR pattern plays, various roll outs / bootleg passing
plays, etc. that are
called to confuse the defense and disguise play tendencies. The closer
I look the more I see each week. Of course the opposition
knows all this and much more - but "knowing it" and
"stopping
it" however are two different things entirely as we saw in the game
this week.
Other Notes & Reflections:
This game seemed to get the team back on track in quite a few
dimensions. Sacks, TFL's, and turnovers all picked up nicely for the
defense in this game for a change. That always has a nice spillover
effect on the offense. If this type of effort can continue as a
trend for the Trojans then they should be able to defeat any team in
the Pac-10. Conversely turn the ball over as they did five times in the
second half versus Stanford and anything can happen. The defense so far
has looked up to the challenge of stopping the opposition from running
the ball in particular. The squad now ranks #4 in the country allowing
just 64 yards per game on the ground. However that metric will be
severely tested against the Oregon Ducks next Saturday. Oregon's top
three receivers were not in action against Washington. Still versus the
Huskies the Ducks ran for an amazing 465 yards on the ground and
they now currently rank #3 in the country in rushing yardage at 294
yards per game. The Ducks lowest rushing game of the season so far has
been 191 yards versus Cal. Total offense wise Oregon is #2 in the
country averaging an impressive 550 yards per game or over 100 yards
more than USC. Next week on the
road at Autzen is the first game where a multiple threat team will test
the
Trojans on defense. How that game plays out will determine which team
stays in the running for the Pac-10 title and maintains its chance at a
major BCS bowl game. I like USC's chances versus Oregon but
they'll have to
contain Dennis Dixon, Jonathon Stewart, and avoid turnovers to come
away with a win.
|
|